"BP is not dead but its future is very dark"

Why oil markets do not react to the catastrophe of BP in the Gulf of Mexico?

It is true that oil prices have finally been little impacted by this disaster. For two reasons. First, it was thought a few days after the disaster, the movement of tankers in the Gulf would be disrupted, which could affect the evolution of very short-term U.S. oil inventories. This was not the case. Meanwhile, outside the six-month moratorium on the exploitation of new platforms, markets await the outcome of the commission, (introduced by the Obama Administration) regarding the future development of deepwater drilling. For the moment nothing has filtered out on the progress of discussions. Yes, President, stuck in the oil slick bomb on his chest and hardens ecological discourse.But for the United States, deprive themselves of deepwater drilling and oil from the Gulf of Mexico equivalent to increasing its short-term dependence on foreign and thereby increase its imports and the movement of tankers. But from a strictly ecological point of view, the likelihood of oil spills associated with tanker accidents is much higher than that related to problems occurring on a platform …

The survival of BP is threatened?

BP is not dead but its future is very bleak. The total cost of the disaster will obviously staggering, at least about 10 billion dollars. But the slate will not pay a single blow and will be paid over several years, which does not undermine the cash short-term business.It remains, however, the cost in terms of reputation and image especially in the United States. Can you imagine, when referring to obtain from the U.S. Administration to permit new drilling in the United States that This case does not come back on the carpet. But the U.S. market is essential for BP. It represents 26% of its oil and gas worldwide, 40% of its sale of petroleum products and 56% of its refining capacity. This ecological disaster is challenging deep and lasting development of BP across the Atlantic.